Profiling and Prioritizing Export Success in a Technopark with LLM-Based Feature Extraction, Explainable Machine Learning, and Fuzzy MCDM

Authors

  • Abdullah Kürşat Merter Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Business Administration, Gebze Technical University, Kocaeli, Türkiye Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6874-1890
  • Murat Çemberci Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8569-4950
  • Fahim Jaman Department of Civil, Environmental, and Transportation Engineering, Morgan State University, 1700 E. Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD 21251, United States Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4024-2592

Keywords:

Technology parks, Export prediction, Natural language processing, Explainable artificial intelligence, Resource allocation

Abstract

Science and technology parks function as primary instruments of regional innovation policy designed to accelerate economic development. However, the evaluation literature predominantly estimates average historical park effects rather than identifying specific tenant firms requiring targeted public support, leaving park administrators without objective tools for allocating scarce resources. The purpose of this research is to address this resource allocation problem by developing a data-driven decision support framework that systematically profiles and prioritizes tenant firms based on their empirical export potential. The methodology applies a large language model to extract technological complexity metrics from 557 unstructured administrative project narratives. It then utilizes explainable machine learning classifiers to predict firm-level export success and translates the resulting algorithmic feature attributions into objective criterion weights for a fuzzy multi-criteria prioritization model. The principal results indicate that park-specific institutional tenure and realized research revenue are the dominant predictors of commercial export success. The regularized predictive model achieves strong out-of-sample classification performance, while the extracted textual innovation scores provide additional predictive information beyond traditional headcount metrics. The results demonstrate that integrating natural language processing with explainable artificial intelligence provides a data-driven alternative to subjective expert judgments in resource allocation. The resulting prioritization framework provides policymakers with an auditable and reproducible tool for effectively targeting internationalization grants and optimizing the distribution of public innovation incentives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2002). Growth, management and financing of new technology-based firms—assessing value-added contributions of firms located on and off science parks. Omega, 30(3), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00023-3

Squicciarini, M. (2008). Science parks’ tenants versus out-of-park firms: Who innovates more? A duration model. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9037-z

Squicciarini, M. (2009). Science parks: Seedbeds of innovation? A duration analysis of firms’ patenting activity. Small Business Economics, 32(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9075-9

Albahari, A., Barge-Gil, A., Pérez-Canto, S., & Landoni, P. (2023). The effect of science and technology parks on tenant firms: A literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(4), 1489–1531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09949-7

T.C. Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı. (2026). Teknoloji Geliştirme Bölgeleri İstatistiki Bilgiler (data as of end-February 2026). Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Industry and Technology, Ankara. https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/istatistikler/istatistiki-bilgiler/mi0203011501

Taş, E., & Erdil, E. (2024). Effectiveness of R&D tax incentives in Turkey. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(2), 6226–6272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01326-5

Teng, T., Zhang, Y., Si, Y., Chen, J., & Cao, X. (2020). Government support and firm innovation performance in Chinese science and technology parks: The perspective of firm and sub‐park heterogeneity. Growth and Change, 51(2), 749–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12372

Bellstam, G., Bhagat, S., & Cookson, J. A. (2021). A text-based analysis of corporate innovation. Management Science, 67(7), 4004–4031. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3682

Kelly, B., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., & Taddy, M. (2021). Measuring technological innovation over the long run. American Economic Review: Insights, 3(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20190499

Micocci, F., & Rungi, A. (2023). Predicting exporters with machine learning. World Trade Review, 22(5), 584–607. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745623000265

Durak, İ., Arslan, H. M., & Özdemir, Y. (2022). Application of AHP–TOPSIS methods in technopark selection of technology companies: Turkish case. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(10), 1109–1123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1925242

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207

Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303

Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1504

Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88

Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995

Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L

Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2003). Science park location and new technology-based firms in Sweden–implications for strategy and performance. Small Business Economics, 20(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022861823493

Lecluyse, L., Knockaert, M., & Spithoven, A. (2019). The contribution of science parks: A literature review and future research agenda. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 559–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-09712-x

Theeranattapong, T., Pickernell, D., & Simms, C. (2021). Systematic literature review paper: The regional innovation system–university–science park nexus. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(6), 2017–2050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09837-y

Rui, C., Lokshin, B., & Mohnen, P. (2023). Heterogeneity in performance of science and technology parks in China: Is there “club” convergence? Papers in Regional Science, 102(6), 1145–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12759

Akçomak, İ. S., & Taymaz, E. (2004). Assessing the effectiveness of incubators: The case of Turkey. ERC Working Paper 04/12, Middle East Technical University.

Vaidyanathan, G. (2008). Technology parks in a developing country: The case of India. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9041-3

Gentzkow, M., Kelly, B., & Taddy, M. (2019). Text as data. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(3), 535–574. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20181020

Dell, M. (2025). Deep learning for economists. Journal of Economic Literature, 63(1), 5–58. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20241733

Korinek, A. (2023). Generative AI for economic research: Use cases and implications for economists. Journal of Economic Literature, 61(4), 1281–1317. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20231736

Arts, S., Hou, J., & Gomez, J. C. (2021). Natural language processing to identify the creation and impact of new technologies in patent text: Code, data, and new measures. Research Policy, 50(2), 104144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104144

Bowen, D. E., III, Frésard, L., & Hoberg, G. (2023). Rapidly evolving technologies and startup exits. Management Science, 69(2), 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4362

Gilardi, F., Alizadeh, M., & Kubli, M. (2023). ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(30), e2305016120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2305016120

Brand, J., Israeli, A., & Ngwe, D. (2023). Using LLMs for market research. Harvard Business School (Working Paper No. 23–062). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4395751

Li, P., Castelo, N., Katona, Z., & Sarvary, M. (2024). Frontiers: Determining the validity of large language models for automated perceptual analysis. Marketing Science, 43(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0454

Carlson, N. A., & Burbano, V. (2026). The use of LLMs to annotate data in management research: Foundational guidelines and warnings. Strategic Management Journal, 47(3), 699–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70023

Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2024). Generative AI. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 66(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7

Çelik, E., & Dalyan, T. (2023). Unified benchmark for zero-shot Turkish text classification. Information Processing & Management, 60(3), 103298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103298

Lessmann, S., Baesens, B., Seow, H. V., & Thomas, L. C. (2015). Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: An update of research. European Journal of Operational Research, 247(1), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.030

Dumitrescu, E., Hué, S., Hurlin, C., & Tokpavi, S. (2022). Machine learning for credit scoring: Improving logistic regression with non-linear decision-tree effects. European Journal of Operational Research, 297(3), 1178–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.053

Xia, Y., Liu, C., Li, Y., & Liu, N. (2017). A boosted decision tree approach using Bayesian hyper-parameter optimization for credit scoring. Expert Systems with Applications, 78, 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.02.017

Ben Jabeur, S., Stef, N., & Carmona, P. (2023). Bankruptcy prediction using the XGBoost algorithm and variable importance feature engineering. Computational Economics, 61(2), 715–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-021-10227-1

Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 30). Curran Associates. https://papers.nips.cc/paper/7062-a-unified-approach-to-interpreting-model-predictions

Vabalas, A., Gowen, E., Poliakoff, E., & Casson, A. J. (2019). Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size. PLOS ONE, 14(11), e0224365. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224365

Chen, Y., Calabrese, R., & Martin-Barragan, B. (2024). Interpretable machine learning for imbalanced credit scoring datasets. European Journal of Operational Research, 312(1), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.06.036

Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1

Özsoy, V. S., Belgin, Ö., & Balkan, D. (2022). A novel approach for determining common weights in two division network DEA: A case study of science and technology parks in Turkey. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(10), 1124–1138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1947491

Ahmed, M., Dogru, A., Zhang, C., & Meng, C. (2025). Learning-based multi-criteria decision model for site selection problems. [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.04055

Published

2026-09-20

How to Cite

Merter, A. K., Çemberci, M., & Jaman, F. (2026). Profiling and Prioritizing Export Success in a Technopark with LLM-Based Feature Extraction, Explainable Machine Learning, and Fuzzy MCDM. Intelligent Modeling and Decision Analytics, 1(1), 1-30. https://www.imda.journal-publishing.org/index.php/imda/article/view/36